Bramber

Borough

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1509-1558, ed. S.T. Bindoff, 1982
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Background Information

No names known for 1510-23

Elections

DateCandidate
1529HENRY SEE
 WILLIAM ROPER
1536(not known)
1539(not known)
1542SIR JOHN CLERE
 ?RICHARD WATKINS
1545SIR JOHN CLERE
 JOHN GILMYN
1547(SIR) WILLIAM SHARINGTON
 JOHN FYLDE
by 23 Jan. 1552CHIDIOCK PAULET 1
 RICHARD BUNNY 2
1553 (Mar.)GEORGE RITHE
 LAWRENCE AWEN
1553 (Oct.)(SIR) JOHN BAKER I
 THOMAS TIMPERLEY
1554 (Apr.)SIR HENRY PALMER
 JOHN STORY
1554 (Nov.)THOMAS ELRINGTON
 JOHN BAKER II 3
1555SIR THOMAS KNYVET
 JOHN BAKER II or THOMAS BAKER
1558HENRY MYNN 4
 NICHOLAS MYNN 5

Main Article

The township of Bramber was overshadowed by the adjoining borough of Steyning, but its position on the most southerly road running the length of Sussex, at the crossing of the river Adur, gave it a measure of independence from its neighbour. The castle, manor and borough formed part of the barony of Bramber belonging to the dukes of Norfolk. On the execution of Catherine Howard the 3rd Duke surrendered his interest in the barony to Henry VIII, and on the death of his stepmother in 1545 Bramber passed to the crown. In 1547 Edward VI granted the barony to Sir Thomas Seymour II, Baron Seymour of Sudeley, upon whose fall two years later it reverted to the crown. In May 1553 Edward Lewknor bought the ‘site of the late castle’ from the King. At her accession Mary restored the barony to the 3rd Duke, and on his death a year later it passed to his grandson and heir, the 4th Duke.6

The borough was administered by a constable assisted by burgesses: the constable was elected annually at the court leet of the manor. No borough records are extant for the period. Indentures survive for all the Parliaments between 1542 and 1555, except for that of April 1554. The first two are written in Latin, the rest in English. The contracting parties are the sheriff of Surrey and Sussex and the burgesses, named and varying in number between three and 15. In February and October 1553 the electors are said to include ‘others’ or to comprise ‘the said burgesses and freeholders and other the i