HIBBERT, George (1757-1837), of Clapham, Surr.
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Family and Education
b. 13 Jan. 1757, 5th s. of Robert Hibbert, merchant, of Manchester, Lancs. by Abigail, da. of William Scholey of Leeds, Yorks. educ. Liverpool and Woolton, Lancs. (Rev. Booth). m. 30 Aug. 1784,1 Elizabeth Margaret, da. of Philip Fonnereau†, 5s. 9da. suc. wife’s uncle Rogers Parker to Munden, nr. Watford, Herts. 1828.
Alderman, London 1798-1803; dir. and several times chairman W.I. Dock Co. 1799-d.; agent for Jamaica 1812-30.
Officer, London and Westminster light horse vols. 1797; lt.-col. commdt. W.I. Dock Co. vols. 1803.
Hibbert’s grandfather and father were well-to-do Manchester merchants. His uncle Thomas Hibbert went to Jamaica in 1734 and by his death in 1780 had become one of the island’s leading merchants and plantation owners. Unlike his elder brothers Thomas and Robert, George never went to the West Indies. His father, who died in 1784, gave him £1,500 when he came of age and left him a further £1,000 in his will. In about 1780 he went to London to join the West India trading house of Hibbert, Purrier and Horton at 9 Mincing Lane. He eventually became head of the firm, which was later styled Hibberts, Fuhr and Purrier and was described in 1800 as the ‘first house’ in the Jamaican trade. In his evidence before the committee of inquiry into the slave trade in 1790 Hibbert, who argued forcefully that abolition would ruin the West India interest, stated that he imported annually produce worth between £200,000 and £250,000 and that he had invested much capital in Jamaica in the form of loans to planters. By 1804 he was also in partnership with Robert and William Hibbert, operating from the same address.2
He was elected an alderman of London in 1798. As one of the ‘old fashioned Whigs’ in the court who dissociated themselves from the Foxites, he ‘rendered material service’ to government by moving the resolution of the London merchants in favour of a property tax, 21 Nov. 1798. The first chairman of the West India Dock Company, he was primarily responsible, with Robert Milligan, for initiating and implementing the new dock scheme, which fully established him as one of the leading figures in the London commercial world.3 He aspired to a seat in Parliament for the City, but it eluded him in 1802 and the following year he resigned his alderman’s gown ‘to avoid the expensive offices of sheriff and lord mayor’, which would soon have fallen to him.4
At the general election of 1806 he was returned unopposed for Seaford as a paying guest of John Leach*. In his maiden speech, 10 Feb. 1807, he declared his utter hostility to the slave trade abolition bill, which he went on to oppose at every stage in its passage through the House. He presented a petition for compensation from the West India merchants and planters, 27 Feb., and on 12 Mar. successfully moved to have it referred to a select committee. On other issues, Hibbert supported the ‘Talents’. He voted for Brand’s motion condemning their successors’ pledge on the Catholic question, 9 Apr., and seconded Lyttelton’s motion regretting the change of administration, 15 Apr. 1807, when he explained that ‘although he had, in the measure regarding the slave trade, uniformly opposed the late administration, yet he was happy in now giving them a proof of his sincere approbation of their general conduct’.
He was returned again with Leach for Seaford, after a token contest, at the 1807 general election and attended the opposition gathering before the opening of the new Parliament, in which he voted against government in almost all the major divisions. He was one of the Whigs who met to endorse Ponsonby’s leadership, 18 Jan. 1809, and was elected to Brooks’s, sponsored by Earl Fitzwilliam, on 30 Apr. 1810. He was one of the minority of 58 who voted for Whitbread’s peace resolution, 29 Feb. 1808, was an active supporter of the campaign for economical reform from 1809 onwards, voted for the release of John Gale Jones, 16 Apr., and for parliamentary reform, 21 May 1810, and divided on the pro-Catholic side in the divisions of 3 Mar., 5 and 25 May 1808, 31 May 1811 and 24 Apr. 1812.
In the debate on the address, 22 Jan. 1808, he urged ministers to start peace negotiations, and although he supported the commercial credit bill, 22 Mar. 1811, he called on them ‘to heal by peace the wound which commerce and the country had received’. He spoke against the orders in council, 18 Feb. 1808, and against Perceval’s exculpatory resolution on the Duke of York scandal, 17 Mar. 1809; supported receipt of the Middlesex petition for the release of Burdett, 2 May 1810, and Tierney’s motion for a secret committee on the Bank, 17 Mar. 1812, when he deplored the continued suspension of cash payments and questioned the necessity for the unlawful oaths bill, 5 May 1812.
As a leading parliamentary spokesman for the West India interest, Hibbert consistently supported the ban on grain distillation, but demanded its extension to Ireland, 6 and 27 Feb. 1809. He supported Brougham’s motion calling for measures to put an effective end to the slave trade, 15 June 1810, explaining that although he had opposed abolition on practical grounds, he had never questioned its desirability on humanitarian ones; but did not fail to point out that the motion in itself vindicated his former argument that abolition would merely encourage the foreign slave trade. He opposed Bankes’s proposal to end the exemption of foreigners from tax on their dividends, 15 June 1808, came to the defence of the West India Dock Company, 27 July 1807 and 8 May 1810, and supported Foster Barham’s proposal to supply the West Indian colonies with free labour from the East, 4 Apr. 1811. When Hibbert retired from Parliament in 1812, Tierney named him among those of ‘our good old supporters and best attenders’ whose services would be missed.5<