MOLYNEUX, Richard II (c.1559-1623), of Croxteth and Sefton, Lancs.
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Family and Education
b. c.1559, 1st s. of William Molyneux by Brigitta, da. of John Caryll† of Warnham, Suss. educ. Univ. Coll. Oxf. 1577. m. (1) by 1567, a da. of Lord Strange; (2) Frances (d.1621), da. of Sir Gilbert Gerard, 6s. 7da. suc. fa. 1567, gd.-fa. 1569. Kntd. 1586; cr. Bt. 1611.2
Hereditary constable, Liverpool castle; steward of Blackburn hundred, duchy of Lancaster 1581; j.p. from c.1583; mayor, Liverpool 1588-9; sheriff, Lancs. 1588-9, 1596-7; collector royal loans 1590, 1597; commr. subsidy 1594, 1599, musters 1596, 1599; receiver-gen. duchy of Lancaster 1607; butler in Lancashire bef. 1611.3
Molyneux inherited from his grandfather the lordship of Liverpool and other hereditary offices which opened up the prospect of a distinguished local career as soon as he attained his majority. In the meantime he was a ward of his future father-in-law, Sir Gilbert Gerard, who returned him to Parliament for Wigan in place of Edward Fitton, who pleaded employment on the Queen’s business. But, on 18 Mar. 1581, the last day of the session, the House changed its mind about allowing replacements for living Members, and ordered Fitton to ‘stand and continue’. In 1584 and 1593 Molyneux obtained election for the county. It was probably he, rather than John Molyneux II, who was named to the subsidy committee, 24 Feb. 1585, and he was named to a committee on 4 Apr. 1593 concerned with measures against recusants. As knight for Lancashire he was entitled to attend the subsidy committee (26 Feb. 1593) and a legal committee (9 Mar. 1593).4
Like his grandfather before him, Molyneux had disagreements with the corporation of Liverpool. In 1592 he also contrived to quarrel with the 4th Earl of Derby, lord lieutenant of the county, canvassed successfully for one of the county seats at the forthcoming election in the face of Derby’s opposition, and, presumably after the 1593 session of Parliament, which ended on 10 Apr., was committed to the Fleet, making his submission to the Privy Council in May. By the time of the next election he was sheriff, and seized the opportunity of taking a small revenge by sending back to London the election writ on a technicality.5
No doubt because of his Catholic relations, the question of Molyneux’s religion was closely watched. An anonymous letter to Walsingham dated 29 Dec. 1586 accused him of Catholic sympathies, but in 1587 ‘he hath lately showed himself very well affected and there is great hope of him, being courteously used’. Three years later he was said to make ‘show of good conformity, but many of his company are in evil note’