LYGON, William (1747-1816), of Madresfield Court, Worcs.

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1790-1820, ed. R. Thorne, 1986
Available from Boydell and Brewer



22 Mar. 1775 - 26 Feb. 1806

Family and Education

b. 25 July 1747, o.s. of Reginald Lygon (formerly Pyndar) of Madresfield Court by Susanna, da. of William Hanmer of Bettisfield, Flints. educ. Christ Church, Oxf. 1764. m. 1 Nov. 1780, Catherine, da. of James Denn, 5s. 6da. suc. fa. 1788; cr. Baron Beauchamp 26 Feb. 1806; Earl Beauchamp 1 Dec. 1815.

Offices Held

Member, board of agriculture 1798.


Lygon never faced a contest for Worcestershire and had nothing to say in debate. He supported Pitt, to whom he applied in 1786 for the revival of the barony of Beauchamp of Powick, extinct since 1503, for his father. He repeated the request for himself, 13 and 22 June 1790, 12 Aug. 1794, 23 May 1796, 8 and 27 Sept. 1797, but the replies were negative.1 He was listed as an opponent of the repeal of the Test Act in Scotland in 1791. In May 1796 he was one of only five county Members who voted for Pitt’s unpopular inheritance tax. He no longer acted with Sir John Sinclair*, except as an honorary member of the board of agriculture.2 On 10 Nov. 1796 he took six weeks’ leave of absence. He voted against the land tax redemption bill, 23 Apr., and for the resolution that there should be no fresh land tax levy without a tax on all income, 18 May 1798.

Lygon transferred his support to Addington in 1801, writing him an enthusiastic letter on the achievement of peace, 4 Oct.3 He was, however, in the minority favouring inquiry into the Prince of Wales’s financial claims, 31 Mar. 1802. On 9 Mar. 1803 he took a month’s sick leave. He was listed ‘Addington etc.’ in May 1804 and, after joining the opposition to Pitt’s additional force bill in June, ‘doubtful Pitt’ in September. In January 1805 he wrote to congratulate Addington on his peerage.4 No further votes of his appear and he was still ‘doubtful Pitt’ in July 1805. In April there had been reports of a peerage for him and he obtained it through Lord Coventry’s application to the King on 3 Feb. 1806, which suggested that he would be succeeded by a ‘constant attendant’ in support of government if his son replaced him as county Member—which he did, after a contest.5

On 13 Jan. 1809 Beauchamp applied to the King for an earldom, claiming a growing income of over £40,000 a year. He obtained one in 1815, but there was a persistent rumour that it was ‘procured by the payment of £10,000 to Col. McMahon, the Regent’s privy purse. Lady Beauchamp’s carriage had been at McMahon’s door every day for a long time previously ...’6 Beauchamp died 21 Oct. 1816.

Ref Volumes: 1790-1820

Authors: M. J. Williams / R. G. Thorne


  • 1. PRO 30/8/153, ff. 258, 261-270; 174, f. 177; 195, f. 91.
  • 2. Morning Chron. 12 May 1796; PRO 30/8/178, f. 250.
  • 3. Sidmouth mss.
  • 4. Ibid. Lygon to Sidmouth, 25 Jan. 1805.
  • 5. Leveson Gower, ii. 64; Geo. III Corresp. iv. 3180, 3183.
  • 6. Geo. III Corresp. v. 3784; Staffs. RO, Hatherton diary, 27 Jan. 1818.