Go To Section
Marlborough
Borough
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Background Information
Right of Election:
in the corporation
Number of voters:
not more than 12
Population:
(1801): 2,367
Elections
Date | Candidate |
---|---|
22 June 1790 | JAMES STOPFORD, Earl of Courtown [I] |
HON. THOMAS BRUCE | |
28 June 1793 | CHARLES WILLIAM HENRY MONTAGU SCOTT, Earl of Dalkeith, vice Courtown, vacated his seat |
30 May 1796 | CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce |
HON. JAMES BRUCE | |
16 Nov. 1797 | ROBERT BRUDENELL vice James Bruce, vacated his seat |
8 July 1802 | CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce |
JAMES HENRY LEIGH | |
4 Nov. 1806 | CHARLES WILLIAM HENRY MONTAGU SCOTT, Earl of Dalkeith |
CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce | |
20 Apr. 1807 | JAMES GEORGE STOPFORD, Visct. Stopford, vice Dalkeith, called to the Upper House |
6 May 1807 | CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce |
JAMES GEORGE STOPFORD, Visct. Stopford | |
10 Apr. 1810 | HON. EDWARD STOPFORD vice Stopford, called to the Upper House |
9 Oct. 1812 | CHARLES BRUCE BRUDENELL BRUCE, Lord Bruce |
HON. EDWARD STOPFORD | |
9 May 1814 | HON. WILLIAM HILL vice Bruce, called to the Upper House |
18 June 1818 | HON. JOHN WODEHOUSE |
JAMES THOMAS BRUDENELL, Lord Brudenell |
Main Article
Marlborough was described by Thomas Bruce, 1st Earl of Ailesbury, to his son Lord Bruce in 1802, as ‘a friendly borough’. Friendly to him, seated five miles away, it certainly was, for his nominees, most of them members of his family, were returned without demur. As at Great Bedwyn, he had only to make his choice and fix his terms. The corporation, nominally 20 in number, had long been reduced to a dozen and consisted of a mere handful of reliable supporters in this period.1 In 1794 Ailesbury was warned of a conspiratorial bid by one Clarke to fetch ‘a candidate with money’ to oppose him, but nothing came of it.2 When in 1806 Lord Dalkeith was unable to attend his election, Ailesbury informed him that it was as well his colleague Stopford had done so, as ‘any chance disappointed candidates passing through the town might have taken the advantage of only one candidate appearing’.3 But there was no such excitement, in his time or when his son the 2nd Earl assumed the patronage in 1814.