Go To Section
Great Bedwyn
Borough
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Background Information
Right of Election:
in freeholders and burgage holders
Number of voters:
about 120
Population:
(1801): 1,632
Elections
Date | Candidate |
---|---|
19 June 1790 | JAMES GRAHAM, Mq. of Graham |
JOHN STUART, Lord Doune | |
24 Dec. 1790 | JAMES GEORGE STOPFORD, Visct. Stopford, vice Graham, called to the Upper House |
11 Feb. 1792 | EDWARD HYDE EAST vice Doune, deceased |
29 June 1793 | STOPFORD re-elected after appointment to office |
28 May 1796 | HON. THOMAS BRUCE |
JOHN WODEHOUSE | |
23 Dec. 1797 | ROBERT JOHN BUXTON vice Bruce, deceased |
5 July 1802 | (SIR) ROBERT JOHN BUXTON, Bt. |
SIR NATHANIEL HOLLAND, Bt. | |
1 Nov. 1806 | JAMES GEORGE STOPFORD, Visct. Stopford |
JAMES HENRY LEIGH | |
18 Apr. 1807 | SIR VICARY GIBBS vice Stopford, appointed to office |
11 May 1807 | JAMES HENRY LEIGH |
SIR JOHN NICHOLL | |
10 Oct. 1812 | JAMES HENRY LEIGH |
SIR JOHN NICHOLL | |
21 Mar. 1818 | JOHN JACOB BUXTON vice Leigh, vacated his seat |
16 June 1818 | SIR JOHN NICHOLL |
JOHN JACOB BUXTON |
Main Article
In 1766 Great Bedwyn came under the complete control of Lord Bruce (subsequently 1st Earl of Ailesbury), when he purchased Lord Verney’s 46 burgages. Bruce already owned as many himself and bought two more in 1787; when he obtained the nine church burgages under the Bedwyn Enclosure Act of 1792 he was in possession of all but one.1 He returned Members friendly to administration, sometimes from his family or circle, sometimes to oblige the government, as in April 1807 when he informed the King that he would ‘have a particular pleasure in choosing the King’s attorney or solicitor-general if they are either of them in want of a seat in Parliament and if his Majesty will be pleased to signify his commands to Lord Ailesbury on that occasion’. Offering a seat to Charles Philip Yorke* in July 1809 he explained ‘I have never attached myself to anybody in the political way but to my sovereign’. Ailesbury was by no means averse to payment from his guests, in view of his ‘immense expense about the borough’, but he did not wish it to be known. His heir the 2nd Earl followed his father’s line after 1814. There was no contest between 1754 and the borough’s disfranchisement in 1832 and elections there were purely convivial occasions.2