Go To Section
Great Grimsby
Borough
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Background Information
Right of Election:
in the resident freemen
Number of voters:
about 150
Elections
Date | Candidate | Votes |
---|---|---|
29 Jan. 1715 | ROBERT CHAPLIN | 66 |
JOSEPH BANKS | 35 | |
Arthur Moore | 29 | |
William Cotesworth | 23 | |
11 Feb. 1721 | ARTHUR MOORE vice Chaplin, expelled the House | 56 |
Robert Vyner | 14 | |
23 Mar. 1722 | BENJAMIN COLLYER | 59 |
CHARLES PELHAM | 56 | |
Arthur Moore | 17 | |
John Page | 15 | |
Joseph Banks | 0 | |
16 Aug. 1727 | JOHN PAGE | 85 |
GEORGEMONSON | 84 | |
Richard Dalton | 10 | |
27 Apr. 1734 | SIR ROBERT SUTTON | |
ROBERT KNIGHT | ||
4 May 1741 | ROBERT KNIGHT | 93 |
WILLIAM LOCK | 82 | |
Mathew Boucherett | 62 | |
Charles Pelham | 42 | |
29 June 1747 | WILLIAM LOCK | |
JOHN GORE |
Main Article
Grimsby was a venal borough, the resort of shady business men, including a strong South Sea contingent— Arthur Moore, expelled from his South Sea directorship in 1714; Sir Robert Chaplin, expelled from the House of Commons for his complicity in the South Sea scandal; John Gore, another guilty but less seriously implicated director, and his brother-in-law, Charles Pelham; Robert Knight, John Page, and Benjamin Collyer, respectively the son, son-in-law, and brother-in-law of Robert Knight, the absconding cashier of the Company. Other Grimsby M.P.s were Sir Robert Sutton, expelled from the House of Commons for the frauds in the Charitable Corporation, Joseph Banks, a land speculator, who out-smarted Moore at an election, and William Lock, a financier. The only Member not in business was George Monson, a barrister. From 1734 the most important electoral influence was that of Christopher Clayton, the town’s high steward, who supported Robert Knight. It was said that ‘through his interest one Member is constantly chosen and if he would exert himself it is not unlikely that both might’.1
Author: Paula Watson
Notes
- 1. G. Oliver, Grimsby, 123; Tennyson d’Eyncourt mss B24, Lincs. Archives Office.