JAMES, Nicholas (d.1433), of London.

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1386-1421, ed. J.S. Roskell, L. Clark, C. Rawcliffe., 1993
Available from Boydell and Brewer



Mar. 1416

Family and Education

s. of James James by his w. Margery. m. Joan, at least 3s. d.v.p. 2da.1

Offices Held

Auditor of London, 21 Sept. 1417-18; warden of London Bridge 21 Sept. 1418-20; alderman of Queenhithe Ward by Jan. 1421-d.2

Sheriff, London and Mdx. Mich. 1423-4.


James’s background remains obscure, although his generous bequests to the parish church of Cromer in Norfolk suggest that he may have been born there. At the time of his death he owned certain unspecified property in Norfolk, which was perhaps left to him by a member of his family. His first appearance, in May 1404, as attorney or factor to the ironmonger, Richard Marlow*, confirms the existence of some early East Anglian connexions, since he was then engaged in negotiating the purchase of a stolen ship and its cargo from inhabitants of Bawdsey in Suffolk. No more is heard of him until May 1412, when he was being sued by a group of men from Rochester: two of his mainpernors were London ironmongers, and it seems likely that he had by then set up in the same business on his own account. Other charges, brought against him in the court of the mayor and aldermen of London, proved far more serious. In July 1415 he was found to have assisted the orphaned daughter of a former alderman to marry without first obtaining permission from the civic authorities. He was put in prison until his fine of £40 for deliberately flouting established custom should be paid, but afterwards the court accepted a token sum of 40s. This incident had little, if any, permanent effect on James’s career, for in the following year he was not only chosen to represent London in Parliament, but was also appointed as an attorney to recover the 10,000 marks lent by the City to Henry V on the security of the wool subsidy.3James had almost certainly begun to take a personal interest in the wool trade by this date. The fragmentary nature of the local customs records makes it impossible to assess the scale of his operations, although he must have done well for himself in this lucrative branch of commerce. In November 1417 he and 14 other merchants successfully petitioned the Crown for a licence to export free of further duty a consignment of wool which had been washed ashore at Ramsgate after the wreck of four ships bound for Calais. One year later he owed the collectors of the wool subsidy in the port of London at least £69 in customs duties, and by 1420 he was bound to them in obligations totalling almost £170. On 6 Oct. 1422 alone he exported 30 sarplers of wool to Calais, and continued to send out regular shipments of wool for the best part of a decade. Meanwhile, in July 1428, his debt to the customs officials stood at £55—a figure which probably represents new exports rather than unpaid arrears on his part. James had become one of the leading merchants of the Calais Staple by November 1430, when he and two other influential Londoners were empowered to recover loans advanced by their associates to the Crown. He also appears to have transacted business in Spain, for in the spring of 1428 he obtained a royal licence to carry, in one of his ships, pilgrims visiting the shrine of St. James of Compostella.4

Less evidence has survived about the general state of James’s finances. In June 1417 he joined with John Reynwell* in advancing £40 towards the cost of Henry V’s second expedition to France. Although the loan was to be repaid from the first wool subsidy due after February 1420, James and Reynwell had still to recover the money six years later, when a second assignment was made to them out of the subsidy of tunnage and poundage. Some of James’s business affairs were extremely complex and involved large sums of money. In February 1421, for example, Sir Humphrey Stafford II*, his son, Sir Richard, and his half-brother, John Stafford, then chancellor of the diocese of Salisbury, bound themselves to pay £513 in regular instalments to James, his friend, John Burgh II*, and William Babington, the chief baron of the Exchequer. Babington and James subsequently acted together as co-feoffees, but the purpose of this particular transaction is open to conjecture. Nor do we know why James and nine others (including the London merchants Nicholas Wotton* and Thomas Walsingham*) began a suit in the court of Chancery in March 1431 against Hamon Sutton* and his associates for the recovery of the enormous sum of £923. This case, which had originally been tried before the court of the mayor of the Staple of Calais, and which clearly involved them all as staplers, dragged on until the following Michaelmas, when it was finally abandoned for lack of evidence. Both parties may then have agreed to reach a private settlement rather than continue with costly litigation. Whether or not, as one Londoner alleged in 1427, James himself was guilty of usurious and extortionate practices cannot now be proved, but he was certainly rich enough to invest in land on an impressive scale.5

At the time of his death, the ironmonger owned farmland, rents and tenements in St. Olave’s parish, Southwark, Croydon in Surrey, and East Anglia. If a petition addressed to the chancellor of England many years later by Joan, the widow of John Rous II* of Ipswich, is to be believed, not all this property was come by honestly. Asserting that her late husband had settled part of her jointure upon him, James apparently first refused to accept the verdict given in Joan’s favour by various independent arbitrators and then set out to ruin her through a series of vexacious and costly actions at law. He is also said to have gained a financial hold over the unfortunate woman by forcing her to enter into bonds for 100 marks, which his executors subsequently tried to enforce. Even if these allegations lacked substance, there can be little doubt that James showed great acumen when dealing in land, some of which may have come into his hands as a result of foreclosures for debt. It is now difficult to tell how much property he acquired in London, since his title was quite often shared with others. His will refers to premises in Church Lane: these comprised at least one tenement and a wharf and were confirmed to him in May 1427.6 He probably made other purchases in the same area, although all the Thames-side shops and buildings in which he possessed an interest were held by him to the use of his friend, the fishmonger, John Perneys*. Towards the end of his life James himself was sometimes described as a fishmonger, and so he may well have been the owner of the tenement in Billingsgate to which he and four other merchants laid claim in January 1428, especially as he maintained strong personal links with the neighbouring church of St. Botolph. But his acquisitions were not confined to this part of London alone, and his right to the tenancy of a dwelling in the parish of Holy Sepulchre without Newgate was upheld at the possessory assizes four years later.7 James did not often act as a feoffee, but he agreed to perform this service for the draper, William Weston IV*, and his former employer, Richard Marlow, who named him among his executors. Nor was he generally disposed to offer sureties on behalf of friends or associates, doing so only twice so far as we can tell.8

James played a full part in the government of London: besides occupying four important civic offices, he attended at least seven of the parliamentary elections held at the Guildhall between 1417 and 1432. Only once, however, in November 1425, was he chosen to arbitrate in a commercial dispute, perhaps because of his evident unwillingness to become involved in the affairs of others.9 James made his will on 24 Apr. 1433 and died within the next six months. He was buried in the church of St. Botolph, Billingsgate, where he endowed a chantry for the souls of his deceased children, three of whom are named. To his two surviving daughters, who were both under age, he left £400, entrusting them to the care of John Perneys, his chief executor. His widow married Robert Elmbridge at some point before August 1434, when she took receipt of the 500 marks settled upon her by her late husband. James’s other bequests came to over £690, part of which was to be raised by the immediate sale of his London property.10

Ref Volumes: 1386-1421

Author: C.R.


  • 1. PCC 18 Luffenham.
  • 2. Cal. Letter Bk. London, I, 189, 204, 226, 245; Beaven, Aldermen, i. 190.
  • 3. PCC 18 Luffenham; CIMisc. vii. no. 278; CCR, 1409-13, p. 307; Cal. Letter Bk. London, I, 141-2, 158.
  • 4. CCR, 1413-19, p. 416; E122/76/2 mm. 1, 2; E122/225/60/6, 8, 67/16-17, 68/4, 6; E404/47/149, 191; DKR, xlviii. 257.
  • 5. CPR, 1416-22, pp. 234-5, 319; CCR, 1419-22, pp. 132-3; 1429-35, pp. 112-13, Corporation of London RO, jnl. 2, f. 100.
  • 6. PCC 18 Luffenham; C1/12/125; Corporation of London RO, hr 155/56, 65; Bridge House deed I 23.
  • 7. Corporation of London RO, hr 145/23, 147/37, 155/38, 157/22; Cal. P. and M. London, 1413-37, p. 217; London Rec. Soc. i. no. 248.
  • 8. CP25(1) 291/64/97; Corporation of London RO, hr 149/60, 159/33; jnl. 2, f. 88; Cal. Letter Bk. London, I, 211.
  • 9. C219/12/2-3, 5, 13/1, 3-4, 14/3; Corporation of London RO, jnl. 2, f. 57.
  • 10. PCC 18 Luffenham; J. Stow, Surv. London ed. Kingsford, i. 207; Cal. P. and M. London, 1413-37, p. 274. James’s other executor, Thomas Badby, later sued the executors of John Perneys for the sum of £386, which he claimed Perneys had wrongfully withheld. He recovered £186 in March 1435 after the dispute had gone before arbitrators (ibid. 283).