PROTHEROE, Edward (1798-1852), of Newnham, Glos. and 28 Charles Street, St. James's Square, Mdx.

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1820-1832, ed. D.R. Fisher, 2009
Available from Cambridge University Press

Constituency

Dates

1826 - 1830
1831 - 1832
1837 - 1847

Family and Education

b. 1798, o.s. of Edward Protheroe† (d. 1856) of Bristol and Anne, da. of John Waterhouse of Wellhead, Halifax, Yorks. educ. Christ Church, Oxf. 1817. unm. Took name of Davis before Protheroe by royal lic, 21 Jan. 1845. d.v.p. 18 Aug. 1852.

Offices Held

Commr. for pub. recs. 1830-4.

Biography

Protheroe’s father, the founder of an extensive industrial empire of collieries and iron works in the Forest of Dean, came from a prosperous family of bankers, West India merchants and local Whig politicians at Bristol, where he was Member, 1812-20. At the 1826 general election Protheroe offered for the open borough of Evesham as ‘a Whig’. After a token contest got up by the independents, who accused him of attempting to forge an ‘unnatural coalition’ with the sitting Tory, he was returned in second place.1 He voted against the Clarences’ grant, 16 Feb., 2 Mar. 1827. He divided for Catholic relief, 6 Mar. 1827, 12 May 1828, and presented favourable petitions, 8 May 1828.2 He voted for inquiry into electoral interference by Leicester corporation, 15 Mar., and for the spring guns bill, 23 Mar. 1827. He divided to withhold the supplies, 30 Mar., and for the disfranchisement of Penryn, 28 May. He was a majority teller for the Coventry magistracy bill, 11 June. He was considered for but not appointed to the finance committee in late November 1827.3 He brought up multiple petitions for repeal of the Test Acts, 15 Feb., for which he voted, 26 Feb. 1828. The following day he joined Brooks’s, sponsored by Lords Essex and Duncannon*. He obtained detailed accounts of the work of the public records commissioners, 19 Feb. 1828, 22 June 1829. He divided against extending East Retford’s franchise to Bassetlaw, 21 Mar. 1828. He was appointed to the committee on the borough polls bill, 2 Apr. He divided for a reduction of corn duties, 22, 29 Apr., and inquiry into chancery delays, 24 Apr. He quizzed ministers over their intentions regarding ‘alteration of the Trinidad laws’, 16 May, and divided against them on the civil list, 20 May. He voted against the appointment of a registrar to the archbishop of Canterbury, 16 June. He divided for the usury laws amendment bill, 19 June, and the corporate funds bill, 10 July. He was in the minority against an amendment to the customs bill affecting the silk duties, 14 July 1828.

Protheroe divided for the Wellington ministry’s concession of Catholic emancipation, 6, 30 Mar., and presented and endorsed petitions in its favour, 16 Mar. 1829. He secured returns of wills and administrations transmitted to the legacy office the following day. He was a regular speaker and presenter of petitions against proposals to relocate Smithfield cattle market, which he denounced as ‘absurd and ludicrous’, 14 May, and was a majority teller against the bill, 15 May. He welcomed the addition of a clause to the friendly societies bill prohibiting ‘compulsory payments for entertainment’ at meetings, 15 May. That day he endorsed the anatomy bill, explaining that the evidence taken before the committee had ‘completely removed’ his initial misgivings. He divided for allowing Daniel O’Connell to take his seat unimpaired, 18 May. He doubted that Buckingham House could ‘be completed for the estimate now framed’, 25 May, when he voted against the grant for the marble arch, but thought ‘no fraud could be fairly imputed’ to John Nash in his handling of crown leases, 19 June 1829. (He welcomed the report of the select committee vindicating Nash, 2 Mar. 1830.) He divided for Lord Blandford’s parliamentary reform scheme, 2 June 1829. On 4 Feb. 1830 Protheroe proposed an amendment to the address on the need to alleviate distress, arguing that ‘discontent from large masses’ and the ‘growing contempt in which the House is held’ could only be dealt with by a ‘decided retrenchment of expense, large reduction of taxation, and by a needful reform, commencing with our own House’. He withdrew it later that day, ‘not from any doubt of the truth’ of his assertions, but because it was ‘the most expedient course’, and voted for a similar amendment moved by Sir Edward Knatchbull. He was erroneously listed by The Times as one of the ‘28 opposition Members who supported the address’.4 He divided to transfer East Retford’s seats to Birmingham, 11 Feb., 5, 15 Mar., for reform, 18 Feb., 28 May, and for the enfranchisement of Birmingham, Leeds, and Manchester, 23 Feb. On 18 Feb. he presented and endorsed a petition from the females of Alcaster against the burning of Hindoo widows and secured confirmation that the Indian government intended to abolish the practice. He brought up another complaining of distress from Stow-in-the-Wold that day, and again urged ministers to ‘promote retrenchments’, 26 Feb. He quibbled with their estimates 8, 29 Mar., and divided steadily with the revived opposition for economy and retrenchment from March 1830.

Protheroe continued to press for improvements to the nation’s public archives, securing returns on the work of the commissioners, 26 Feb., 4 Mar., 11 June, urging ‘consideration of a measure for the collection and preservation of the different records scattered throughout this great city’, 3 May, and complaining of the ‘extraordinary want’ of a building for ‘keeping our testamentary records’ and ‘taking care of the records in Doctors’ Commons’ and the ‘papers in Westminster Hall’, 10 May 1830. On 24 May he accused the existing commissioners of ‘the grossest blunders’ in the printing of records and called for the appointment of an entirely new commission composed of ‘competent persons of antiquarian taste and research’ rather than ‘bishops and great officers of state’. He was made a commissioner himself later that year. On 4 Mar. he spoke in support of a Galway petition complaining that Catholics were not permitted to be admitted as freemen and were thus denied the franchise. He called for the opening up of St. James’s, 26 Mar., and Regent’s Parks, 29 Mar., when he asserted that ‘a comparison of our parks’ with those ‘on the continent does not tell in our favour’. He warned against any ‘architectural expense’ and ‘extravagance’ of ‘external decorations’ in the construction of the Pembroke dockyard chapel, 29 Mar. He divided for Jewish emancipation, 5 Apr., 17 May, endorsed favourable petitions from Bristol, 4 May, and argued for the admission of ‘all religious denominations, to a participation of equal civil rights and privileges’, 17 May. He voted for abolition of the Irish lord lieutenancy, 11 May. Citing the overcrowding of London’s burial grounds, he recommended the removal of interments ‘to a place distant from the metropolis’, 13 May. Explaining that he wished to ‘obviate objections to the church’ and ‘see the clergy discharge their duties properly’, he urged that the ‘stumbling-block of tithes ... be set to rights’, 18 May, when he voted for the proper use of Irish first fruits revenues. He presented a petition from Neath for abolition of the death penalty for forgery, 24 May, and voted thus that day, 7 June, 20 July. On 10 June he rebutted attacks by the home secretary Peel on the parliamentary conduct of Joseph Hume. He presented a petition from the Forest of Dean collieries against the coal duties, 11 June 1830.

Protheroe had resolved to retire from Evesham at the 1830 dissolution and accept ‘repeated applications’ to come forward for an anticipated opening at Bristol, with ‘assurances of support’ from ‘the tried friends’ of his father.5 Speaking in the House of his backing for the abolition of slavery, 13 July, he described how ‘no sooner had I made known my sentiments’ than ‘I was threatened with a formidable opposition from the powerful body connected with the West Indian interest’, and that ‘I have been implored in consequence’ to ‘absent myself from the House this night’. This he refused to do, commenting:

Those advisors little know the spirit by which my public conduct has been actuated if they imagine that any personal consequence to myself can possibly influence my attendance or my vote ... It will be a subject of lasting gratification to myself, that the last vote I shall have given in this Parliament, will be in favour of the rights of humanity.

He duly voted for the abolition of slavery that day, jeopardizing his prospects at Bristol. Instead of ‘bowing to the inevitable’, however, he ignored his advisors and stood his ground, declaring that ‘not by expense, not by interest, not by popular tumult, but by moral strength alone shall the triumph be obtained’ and resolving to ‘expend nothing’. After a bitter contest, during which he stubbornly refused to concede defeat and was ‘seriously injured’ in a riot, he was beaten, falling 535 votes short of the 3,378 cast for his nearest rival.6 Offering again at the 1831 general election with ‘unchanged principles’ and ‘undiminished spirit’, he declared his support for the Grey ministry’s ‘excellent plan of parliamentary reform’ and pledged ‘to vote for the bill, the whole bill, and nothing but the bill’. He was returned unopposed.7 He divided for the second reading of the reintroduced bill, 6 July, at least twice against adjourning the debates, 12 July, and steadily supported its details, though he argued and voted for giving Stoke two Members, 4 Aug., and divided for the disfranchisement of Aldborough, 14 Sept. Denying reports that ‘reform fever’ had ‘abated in Bristol’, he claimed that it was only owing to his influence that his constituents had refrained from ‘the strongest remonstrances on the subject of the delays which have retarded the progress of the bill’ and called for all other business to stand over until it was passed, 27 Aug. He spoke and voted against Edmund Peel’s amendment to preserve the electoral rights of freemen, 30 Aug., insisting that although he had ‘been sent here to support the bill and the whole bill’, he was ‘left entirely at liberty with respect to its details’. He divided for the bill’s passage, 21 Sept., the second reading of the Scottish bill, 23 Sept., and Lord Ebrington’s confidence motion, 10 Oct. 1831.

Protheroe was appointed to select committees on the East India Company, 28 June, the House of Commons, 9 Aug., and the West Indian colonies, 7 Oct., 15 Dec. 1831. He called for accounts of the charity funds administered by corporations and details of their distribution in Bristol, 29 June. He encouraged John Cam Hobhouse to reintroduce his bill to open select vestries, which ‘yields, in point of importance, only to the reform bill’, 30 June. He presented and endorsed a Bristol petition for inclusion in the vestries bill, 28 Sept., and argued in its support, 30 Sept., 5 Oct., when he denounced the present system as a ‘great injustice’. He warned of the ‘evils which must arise’ from the ‘establishment of an unlimited number of beer houses in the agricultural districts’, 30 June. He advocated repeal of the soap tax, 1 July. He called for ‘some part of the new building in the British Museum’ to be ‘appropriated for records contained in the about to be demolished King’s Mews’, 8 July. Speaking on Irish education, he defended the role of Catholic priests, 15 July. He was in the minorities for civil list reductions, 18 July, and reappointing the original Members chosen to serve on the Dublin election committee, 29 July. Although ‘pledged to support every measure of economy’, he welcomed the grant to the duchess of Kent, 3 Aug. He secured returns of spirit duties, 5 Aug., when he