BARING, Sir Francis, 1st Bt. (1740-1810), of Lee, Blackheath, Kent and Stratton Park, Hants.
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Family and Education
b. 18 Apr. 1740, 3rd s. of John Baring, woollen merchant, of Larkbear, Exeter, Devon by Elizabeth, da. of John Vowler, provisions merchant, of Bellairs, nr. Exeter; bro. of John Baring*. educ. Exeter; by Mr Fargue, Hoxton; by Mr Fuller, Lothbury. m. 12 May 1767, Harriet, da. and coh. of William Herring of Croydon, Surr., 5s. 5da. cr. Bt. 29 May 1793.
Dir. Royal Exchange Assurance Co. 1768-80; dir. E.I. Co. 1779-d., dep. chairman 1791-2, chairman 1792-3.
By 1790, when he began to buy landed property on a large scale, Baring was a leading figure in the London commercial world and an acknowledged expert on matters of trade and finance. The family financial house was firmly established, with a growing international reputation, and Baring was leader of the City interest in the East India Company.
His basic political loyalty was to the 1st Marquess of Lansdowne, with whom he had supported government on the Regency question. In 1789 he paid Samuel Smith II* £1,500 for a seat for Ilchester at the next general election, but Smith lost control of the borough in the interim and Baring was defeated at the poll in 1790. As chairman of the East India Company in 1792, he was critical of Dundas’s terms for the renewal of the charter and persuaded the minister to modify them. His baronetcy, conferred in 1793, was seen as a reward for his services at East India House. The French wars brought handsome profits to Baring who, on his own and the firm’s account, took a prominent part in the marketing of government loans. In 1795 he began to exploit the opportunities offered by trade with America, where he already had a footing, and the firm’s American business expanded rapidly and rewardingly.1
Baring re-entered the House after successfully contesting Wycombe on Lansdowne’s interest at a by-election in 1794. At the general election of 1796 Lansdowne brought him in for Calne and in 1802 he stood again for Wycombe, probably on Lansdowne’s recommendation (though the marquess had sold his property there), was returned unopposed and went on to establish a family interest of his own. He continued to follow Lansdowne’s political line, voting consistently, though irregularly, with the Foxite opposition to Pitt. He cast at least six votes against the war which he was helping to finance and voted against the suspension of habeas corpus, 16 and 17 May 1794, and for Fox’s motion on the state of the nation, 24 Mar. 1795. He spoke against the naval augmentation plan as injurious to shipowners and merchants, 2 Feb., and cavilled at the size of the sum to be raised in new taxes, 23 Feb. 1795. He criticized the financial transactions involving Boyd, Benfield and Company, 5 Feb., 7 Dec. 1795, but according to Joseph Jekyll, who described him as ‘wise, well informed and sagacious’, though ‘apprehensive and inactive in the House’, threw ‘cold water’ on his plan to make a major attack on the Hamburg bill transaction, in which Pitt was implicated.2 He did, however, support Jekyll’s censure motion, 29 Feb. 1796. In 1797 Baring published two pamphlets on the Bank of England and the circulating medium, in which he argued that bank-notes should be made legal tender, with a carefully limited circulation, views which he expounded in the House, 22, 27 Mar. and 30 May 1797. He did not vote for Grey’s parliamentary reform motion, 26 May 1797, and during the period of the Whig secession cast only five recorded votes against government, on the state of Ireland, 14 and 22 June, against the income tax, of which he was a frequent verbal critic, 14 Dec. 1798, and against the suspension of habeas corpus, 21 Dec. 1798 and 5 June 1800. He voted for the amendment to the address, 2 Feb. 1801.