KECK, Sir Anthony (1630-95), of the Inner Temple, London
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Family and Education
bap. 28 Mar. 1630, 5th s. of Nicholas Keck of Old Cowcliffe, Oxon. and Long Marston, Warws. by Margaret, da. of John Morris of Bretforton, Worcs. educ. I. Temple 1653, called 1659, bencher 1677. m. 11 June 1660, Mary, da. of Francis Thorne, 1s. 7da. Kntd. 5 Mar. 1689.1
Commr. gt. seal Feb. 1689–May 1690.2
A lawyer, Keck had been counsel for Lord Stafford during the impeachment of the five popish lords in 1678 and thereafter appeared in many cases before the House of Lords. Specializing in Chancery cases, he also acted as legal adviser to Lord Hatton (Christopher Hatton†). In 1689 he was appointed as a commissioner of the great seal with a salary of £1,500 p.a. His tenure ceased in May 1690 and shortly afterwards he declined promotion to first commissioner, which was regarded as ‘a great act of self-denial’. He was returned for Tiverton at a by-election in 1691. In May he subscribed £283 to a crown loan. He spoke on 13 Nov. in favour of hearing complaints against the East India Company and in support of setting up a new company. He supported the triennial bill of 1693, but being lame with the gout was accorded the concession of not having to move across the House upon a division in a committee of the whole. Sir Joseph Williamson* recorded the episode in his notes on parliamentary procedure:
A member totally lame is to change sides, another Member of contrary opinion in the division chooses to go over and be told in his place, etc. So Mr [Charles] Montagu for Sir Anthony Keck in the division as to the triennial bill, 8 Feb. 1693. No notice take of it.
Keck spoke the following day against the third reading of the bill, maintaining that it did not
invade the King’s prerogative, for . . . nothing tends more to it than frequent Parliaments, and to settle this government on a lasting foundation, which was also the opinion of King James II in several of his speeches. And you will find all your grievances and the mismanagements of government have been committed in the interval of Parliaments.
On one occasion he described the Commons to Sir Richard Cocks, 2nd Bt.*, as ‘a bear garden’, adding that
we have generally a very thin House and at committees for elections . . . some of the Members come in drunk, some sleep and some tumultuous, and seldom any mind the justice but his friend or the party. I remembe