LAWSON, Sir Wilfred (c.1610-88), of Isel, Cumb.

Published in The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1660-1690, ed. B.D. Henning, 1983
Available from Boydell and Brewer

Constituency

Dates

Family and Education

b. c.1610, o.s. of William Lawson of Isel by Judith, da. and h. of William Bewley of Hesket. educ. Queen’s, Oxf. matric. 21 Nov. 1628, aged 17. m. Jane (d. 8 June 1677), da. of Sir Edward Musgrave, 1st Bt., of Hayton Castle, 5s. (2 d.v.p.) 8da. Kntd. 26 Feb. 1641; suc. fa. c.1654; cr. Bt. 31 Mar. 1688.1

Offices Held

Commr. of array, Cumb. 1642; j.p. Cumb. ?1642-May 1643, Cumb. and Westmld. Oct. 1643-d.; commr. for assessment, Cumb. 1644-52, 1657, Aug. 1660-80, militia, Cumb. 1648, Cumb. and Westmld. Mar. 1660; mayor, Carlisle 1652-3, 1657-8; sheriff, Cumb. 1653-7, capt. of militia to 1659, Oct. 1660, dep. lt. c. Aug. 1660-d., commr. for recusants 1675.2

Col. (parliamentary) by 1644.3

Commr. for security [S] 1656.

Biography

Lawson’s great-uncle acquired Isel by marriage in Elizabethan times, first representing Cumberland in 1593. His father, who inherited the estate in 1632, was a ship-money sheriff, but sat on the county committee in the Civil War. Lawson himself, though knighted in 1641 and nominated to the commission of array, took up arms for Parliament, and was appointed commander-in-chief for Cumberland in 1644. He held local office throughout the Interregnum, and sat for the county in Richard Cromwell’s Parliament. But his loyalty to the Rump was suspect, and he was imprisoned with Charles Howard after Booth’s rising.4

Lawson was re-elected for Cumberland in 1660 after a stiff contest with Sir George Fletcher. Lord Wharton marked him as a friend, entrusting him with the management of the Cumbrian and some of the west-country Members. An inactive Member of the Convention, he was appointed to 11 committees, including the committee of elections and privileges and those for the land purchases and indemnity bills. After the Restoration he was named to the committees to inquire into impropriate rectories and unauthorized Anglican publications. On 7 July (Sir) Christopher Clapham introduced a proviso to the indemnity bill requiring Lawson to make reparations to Sir Jordan Crosland and his wife for the plunder of Rydal. Lawson, in his only recorded speech, ‘made his defence, saying he never saw any plate or moneys’, and the House accepted this convenient myopia. He received Wharton’s statement of the case for modified episcopacy, but took no part in the proceedings, though he