GOODWIN, Francis (1564-1634), of Upper Winchendon, Bucks.
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Family and Education
b. 1564, 2nd but 1st surv. s. of Sir John Goodwin by his 2nd w. Anne, da. of Sir William Spencer. m. Elizabeth, da. of Arthur Grey, 14th Lord Grey of Wilton, 2s. 2da. suc. fa. 1597. Kntd. 1601.
J.p. Bucks. from c.1591, q. by 1601, commr. musters 1596, sheriff 1623-4.
Of a family established in Buckinghamshire for just over a century, Goodwin was elected senior knight of the shire when only 22, and before he had succeeded to his estates. He perhaps owed this early honour to the influence of his father-in-law, Lord Grey of Wilton, who lived at Whaddon. In this Parliament the first knights of the shire were appointed to the subsidy committee on 22 Feb. 1587. Unsuccessful for the county in 1589, Goodwin was chosen at Chipping Wycombe. He tried to retain this seat in 1593, but he had a great enemy, one John Dorrell, who, to cover his own activities on behalf of his master Henry Windsor, 5th Lord Windsor, the high steward of the borough, accused Goodwin of using ‘extraordinary labour’ to obtain votes, and Goodwin was defeated. One of the successful candidates, Thomas Fortescue II, was a son of (Sir) John Fortescue I, Goodwin’s chief opponent in the county. This Goodwin-Fortescue rivalry surfaced again in the famous election dispute of 1604, which earned Goodwin notoriety in his day, and a place in history. After missing the 1589 Parliament Goodwin was again successful for Buckinghamshire in 1597, when he was named to several committees: armour and weapons (8 Nov.), marriages without banns (14 Nov.) and a private bill (24 Jan. 1598). The knights of the shire were also eligible to attend committees concerning enclosures (5 Nov.), the poor law (5, 22 Nov.), the penal laws (8 Nov.), monopolies (10 Nov.) and the subsidy (15 Nov.). Dorrell, in the meantime, had conceived ‘deadly hatred’ against Goodwin, whom he accused of having ‘the place but of a bare j.p.’, whereas he had been made a commissioner of musters even in his father’s lifetime. Dorrell libelled him in Goodwin’s Discovery; claimed that he had embezzled money collected for a town distressed by plague, that he dealt partially ‘without any regard for justice’, that Chipping Wycombe ‘h