RADCLIFFE, Sir Humphrey (1508/9-66), of Elstow, Beds. and Beddington, Surr.
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Family and Education
b. 1508/9, 3rd s. of Robert Radcliffe, 1st Earl of Sussex, by 1st w. Elizabeth, da. of Henry Stafford, 2nd Duke of Buckingham; half-bro. of Sir John Radcliffe. m. Elizabeth or Isabel, da. and h. of Edmund Harvey of Elstow, 2s. Edward† and Thomas† at least 3da. Kntd. by June 1536.2
Gent. pens. 1540-52, lt. 1552-5 or later; j.p. Beds. 1554, q. 1561-d.; sheriff, Beds. and Bucks. 1558-9; steward, manor of Elstow 1563-d.3
Named after his maternal great-grandfather, Humphrey Radcliffe was introduced at court by his father, the 1st Earl of Sussex. As a boy he was contracted to marry one of the two daughters of John Marney, 2nd Baron Marny, but in the event Catherine Marney married his brother George and he the daughter of a courtier. In 1536 he took part in the celebrations marking the King’s marriage to Jane Seymour and he seems to have been one of the young men knighted then by Henry VIII. A year later he attended the christening of Prince Edward and not long after the funeral of the Queen. Appointed to the new bodyguard set up in 1540 he was present at the reception of Anne of Cleves and all the main state occasions throughout the 1540s and early 50s. He served in the expedition which took Boulogne, but he is not known to have fought in either Edward VI’s Scottish war or Mary’s French one.4
On his marriage Radcliffe settled in Surrey, where his father-in-law, Edmund Harvey, was keeper of the Carew property at Beddington following the execution of Sir Nicholas Carew, but on receiving the manor of Elstow from Harvey in July 1553 he migrated to Bedfordshire. By that time he had already sat in the previous Parliament as one of the knights for the shire, having been returned in opposition to a directive from the Privy Council in support of Sir John St. John and Lewis Dyve. Dyve was elected, but St. John was passed over in favour of Radcliffe. Why St. John, who had sat for the county at least twice before, should have been replaced this time is a matter for speculation, as is the choice of Radcliffe, a man 20 years younger than St. John and without experience of local management or of the House. His position at court may have commended him although he lacked government support. (It may not be without significance that his nephew Thomas Radcliffe, Lord Fitzwalter, was not summoned to the Lords on this occasion, as were the heirs to other earldoms, but also sat as a knight of the shire.) His local affiliation, standing at court and noble kin explain his repeated election as one of the knights for Bedfordshire in all but one of Mary’s Parliaments. His regular appearance in the House does not seem t