BERKELEY, Sir Maurice (1358-1400), of Uley and Stoke Gifford, Glos.
Available from Boydell and Brewer
Family and Education
b. Uley, 1 June 1358, s. and h. of Sir Thomas Berkeley (d.1361), by Katherine, da. of John, 2nd Lord Botetourt. m. bef. May 1400, Joan (d. 22 Aug. 1412), da. of Sir John Dynham of Hartland, Devon, 1s. Sir Maurice†.1 Kntd. between July and Sept. 1379.
Commr. of inquiry, Glos., Som. June 1389 (trespasses, Fullwood and Kingswood).
J.p. Glos. 15 July 1389-June 1390.
Maurice was the great-grandson of Maurice, Lord Berkeley (d.1326), and grandson of the Sir Maurice who led a distinguished career in war and diplomacy under Edward III. His father fought at Poitiers, but died at an early age in 1361, leaving the three-year-old child as heir to his estates. These, owing to the generosity shown to this branch of the family by their noble kinsmen (‘Maurice the Magnanimous’ and ‘Thomas the Ritch’), were considerable: young Berkeley’s inheritance included the manors of Kings Weston, Aylburton, Bradley and Uley, in Gloucestershire, Kingston Seymour in Somerset, and Brigmerston and Milston in Wiltshire, besides smaller properties in Hampshire. In addition, when John, Lord Mautravers, a distant relation, died without male issue three years later, the boy inherited the manors of Rockhampton, Stoke Gifford and Wallscourt (Gloucestershire), under the terms of an entail. Contemporary evidence of the value of these estates is lacking, but at Berkeley’s death those in Gloucestershire and Wiltshire alone were said to be worth nearly £154 a year. Berkeley’s wardship had been granted in 1363 to his stepfather, Sir John Thorpe†, and it was not until 1380 that he made proof of age and obtained seisin of the bulk of his inheritance. That part of the Berkeley estates held as dower by his mother (one of the daughters of the last Lord Botetourt) fell to him only after her death in January 1388.2
Berkeley’s career had begun in July 1379, when, since he had not yet furnished proof that he had reached his majority, the Crown appointed guardians to accompany him on a voyage to Brittany in the retinue of the ruler of the duchy, John de Montfort. While abroad in the duke’s service he was knighted and in September, after a brief sojourn at home, he made a second journey to Brittany, on this occasion in the company of John, Lord Arundel, the marshal of England. Berkeley spent long stretches of the next few years abroad: he is known to have taken out royal letters of protection for service overseas in June 1380, April 1383 and November 1385, the last being in order to take part in a military expedition to Flanders for the defence of Ghent. Consequently, it was not until the summer of 1389 that he was first appointed to royal commissions at home in Gloucestershire, and even then he was named on no more than a single commission of inquiry (which he later claimed he had never received) and a single commission of the peace.3
The year 1391 saw the culmination of a dispute between Berkeley and the collegiate church of St. Mary at Leicester over ownership of the manor of Wollaston, Northamptonshire, which had at one time been in the Berkeley family’s possession. The debate was brought to a close on 31 Oct., when John, duke of Lancaster (the church’s patron), who had taken upon himself the task of examining the evidence, successfully persuaded Berkeley that he had no valid claim to the property. Such an encounter would not seem to have been auspicious for subsequent good relations between duke and knight, yet Gaunt clearly intended to win Sir Maurice over. Only two days later he named Berkeley as one of his bachelors, retaining him for life in peace and war and awarding him an annuity of £20 charged on the issues of the lordship of Monmouth. Berkeley had already been elected to represent Gloucestershire in the Parliament which was to assemble the very next day (3 Nov.). His contract with Lancaster soon led to further service overseas: he sailed for Aquitaine with the duke in August 1393, remaining in the duchy at Gaunt’s expense, with a small personal contingent of two esquires and three archers, until 25 Apr. 1395.4
Berkeley’s return home did not signal any further appointments in the sphere of local administration, perhaps because he had shown no aptitude for it earlier. His remaining years were disturbed only by minor troubles: in 1396 he was fined for blocking the course of a stream at Kingston Seymour, and in 1398 an official enq